Why Are Cross-Chain Bridges the Weakest Link in Web3 Security?
Imagine a beautiful highway system that connects dozens of cities. Each city has its own rules, its own currency, and its own security guards. To move your money from one city to another, you have to go through a toll bridge. That bridge is guarded, insured, and supposed to be safe. Yet in the last four years, thieves have stolen more than $3.5 billion dollars from those bridges, not from the cities themselves. Welcome to the world of cross-chain bridges in Web3. In 2025, we have hundreds of blockchains: Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, Avalanche, Polygon, Arbitrum, and many more. They all work great on their own, but users want to move assets between them. Cross-chain bridges are the only way to do that today. And unfortunately, they have become the number one target for hackers. Ronin, Wormhole, Harmony, Nomad, Multichain, and dozens of smaller bridges have all been hit. This blog post explains, in simple terms, what cross-chain bridges are, why they keep getting hacked, and what the industry is doing about it. Even if you are completely new to crypto, you will understand why bridges are currently the weakest link in Web3 security.
Table of Contents
- What Is a Cross-Chain Bridge?
- Why Do We Need Bridges at All?
- How Most Bridges Actually Work
- The Biggest Bridge Hacks (2021-2025)
- Five Reasons Bridges Are So Easy to Hack
- Bridges vs. Native Blockchains: Security Comparison
- New Solutions and Hope for the Future
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Is a Cross-Chain Bridge?
A cross-chain bridge is a set of smart contracts and servers that lets you move tokens from one blockchain to another. For example, you lock 10 ETH on Ethereum, and the bridge mints 10 “wrapped” ETH on BNB Chain so you can use it there. When you want to go back, you burn the wrapped version and unlock the original. Popular bridges in 2025 include Wormhole, LayerZero, Axelar, Synapse, Hop, Stargate, and the older Multichain (now shut down after a $1.4 billion exploit).
Why Do We Need Bridges at All?
Different blockchains are like different countries with their own money. Ethereum is secure but slow and expensive. Solana is fast and cheap but has gone offline several times. Polygon and Arbitrum are great for DeFi. Users and money naturally want to flow to wherever fees are lowest or yields are highest. Without bridges, all your assets would be trapped forever on the chain where you bought them.
How Most Bridges Actually Work
Most bridges today use one of two designs:
- Lock-and-mint (trusted): You lock tokens on chain A, validators sign a message, mint equivalent tokens on chain B.
- Liquidity pools (trustless-ish): You swap into a pool on chain B, someone else’s tokens are released on chain A (like Hop or Anyswap).
The lock-and-mint model is by far the most common and the most hacked because it depends on a small group of validators being honest and keeping their private keys safe.
The Biggest Bridge Hacks (2021-2025)
| Date | Bridge | Amount Stolen | How It Happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2022 | Ronin (Axie Infinity) | $625 million | Hacker stole 5/9 validator keys |
| Feb 2022 | Wormhole | $320 million | Signature verification bug |
| Jun 2022 | Harmony Horizon | $100 million | 2/4 multisig compromised |
| Jul 2023 | Multichain | $1.4 billion (total TVL) | CEO allegedly took private keys |
| Aug 2022 | Nomad | $190 million | Anyone could withdraw by copying a transaction |
| Oct 2022 | BNB Chain bridge | $570 million (partially stopped) | Validator compromise |
Total losses from bridge hacks since 2021 exceed $3.5 billion, more than all DeFi hacks combined in some years.
Five Reasons Bridges Are So Easy to Hack
- Centralized validators: Most bridges use 5-20 validators. Compromise just a few and you control the bridge.
- Complex code across chains: Bugs in one chain’s contract can be exploited from another.
- Huge money at rest: Bridges hold billions in locked assets, perfect targets.
- Rushed development and audits: Many bridges launch with incomplete audits or upgrade without proper review.
- Economic attacks pay off: Even a “small” $50 million bridge hack is life-changing money.
Bridges vs. Native Blockchains: Security Comparison
| Feature | Native Blockchain (Ethereum, Solana) | Typical Cross-Chain Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Number of validators | Thousands to millions | 5-30 |
| Cost to attack | Billions (51 % attack) | Sometimes under $100 k |
| Code complexity | High but well-tested | Very high, new code |
| Upgrade process | Slow, community governance | Fast, often centralized |
| Money at rest | Spread across millions of users | Concentrated in bridge contracts |
New Solutions and Hope for the Future
- Light clients and zero-knowledge bridges (e.g., Polygon zkEVM, zkSync, Succinct Labs)
- Message-passing protocols like LayerZero, Axelar, and Wormhole v2 with better guardian networks
- Chain-specific bridges (Optimism’s new bridge, Arbitrum’s BoLD)
- Intent-based systems (Across, Hyperlane) that route through the safest path
- Insurance funds and rate limits (Wormhole now limits large transfers)
Many experts believe true trustless bridges using zero-knowledge proofs or light clients will solve most problems in the next 2-3 years.
Conclusion
Cross-chain bridges are the weakest link in Web3 security today because they combine centralized validator sets, complex new code, and huge pools of locked money. More than $3.5 billion has been stolen since 2021, far more than from any other type of project. Until zero-knowledge or fully decentralized solutions mature, users should treat bridges with extreme caution: move only what you can afford to lose, prefer well-audited bridges with insurance, and watch for rate limits. The dream of a connected, multi-chain future is real, but right now the bridges we walk on are still made of wood instead of steel.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a cross-chain bridge?
A system that lets you move tokens from one blockchain to another.
Why are bridges hacked so often?
They use few validators, complex code, and hold billions in one place.
Which bridge hack was the biggest?
Ronin in March 2022, $625 million.
Is Wormhole safe now?
Safer than 2022, but still relies on guardians.
Are all bridges centralized?
Most popular ones today have some centralization; true trustless ones are coming.
What is a light client bridge?
It verifies the source chain directly without trusting middlemen.
Should I avoid bridges completely?
Not necessary, but only use well-known, insured ones and never store large amounts.
What is the safest bridge in 2025?
Many consider LayerZero + Stargate or Axelar among the better-audited options.
What is chain-hopping?
Moving funds through many bridges to launder money.
Will zero-knowledge solve bridge hacks?
Yes, zk bridges can be mathematically trustless.
What happened to Multichain?
The CEO allegedly disappeared with private keys in 2023; $1.4 billion lost.
Can native Bitcoin be bridged safely?
Very hard; most BTC bridges (WBTC, tBTC) are custodial or semi-custodial.
What is a liquidity bridge?
Uses pools instead of lock-and-mint (e.g., Hop, Connext).
Why did Nomad lose $190 million?
A single configuration mistake let anyone withdraw funds.
Is Synapse bridge safe?
Had issues in 2024, but recovered and upgraded.
What is an intent-based bridge?
You say “I want USDC on Arbitrum” and solvers find the best route.
Will we ever have perfect bridges?
Not perfect, but zk light-client bridges will be close to native chain security.
Should I keep money on layer-2 or main chain?
Bridges to layer-2 are usually safer than random EVM chain bridges.
Why do hackers love bridges?
High reward, relatively low technical difficulty compared to 51 % attacks.
When will the bridge problem be solved?
Major improvements expected 2026-2028 with zk and light-client technology.
What's Your Reaction?
